Architecture · Spatial Systems · Explainable AI
I design buildings and build the systems that let machines reason about them. From housing and typology to ArchFlow, I make geometry answerable to decisions, obligations, and repair—not just visual plausibility.
SELECTED TRAJECTORY · 04 WORKS
These four works establish the through-line: collective life is organised through legible architectural frameworks, and computational systems remain answerable to spatial judgment. The complete project archive continues below.

A productive housing framework where care, food and shared life are organised as one spatial system.

A civic market carried from urban armature and public room to construction-scale resolution.

A public bathhouse choreographed through weight, sectional sequence and movement.

A white-box workflow that preserves intent through obligations, causal validation and local repair.
All studio, competition, professional, exhibition and independent work remains available below.
Buildings first: housing, civic space, adaptive reuse and tectonic studies

Multi-generational living and self-sufficient agriculture
DESIGN LEAD · COLLABORATIVE
A market as a framework for collective memory
DESIGN LEAD · COLLABORATIVE
Recreation centre · adaptive reuse

A public bathhouse for Harlem

Adaptive futures on Roosevelt Island

Formal and structural studies
Testing machine generation without surrendering architectural judgment
An explainable intent-to-architecture compiler: briefs become auditable decisions, obligations, geometry and local repair. Voxel space is the testbed, not the destination.
SELECTED PUBLIC EVIDENCE · V1 ARCHIVE
Not a feature dump. These archived figures expose only three testable claims: the output remains architectural, failures have causes, and variation remains governed.
A decision path must end in a recognisable building artifact, not merely a plausible image. Its geometry remains tied to auditable commitments.
A valid load path passes; altered cases fail at the broken relation. The validator returns a repair location, not just a score.
Changing the site changes the module while canonical relations remain stable. Scale is governed upstream, not stretched afterward.
PUBLIC BOUNDARY — Shown: decision order, causal validation and controlled scale. Withheld: prompts, private retrieval material, live parameters and unreleased V3 mechanisms. Figures are original V1 evidence; visible scores are archival, not current benchmarks.
Live evidence of compiled state, obligations, gates, failures and current claim boundaries
Nine diagrams tracing how intent becomes lawful action, geometry, provenance and repair
Inspect delivered geometry in the same discrete space where architectural claims are tested
Selected recognition and finalist work
Selected studies and experiments
Professional practice
Curation and exhibition design
A long-running spatial practice — 150K+ followers · 3M+ downloads